Self-Evaluation of Framework
Importance of Evaluations:
![]() |
| Image Source |
Summary of Triple E Framework:
![]() |
| Source Image |
1) Engagement in the Learning
This aspect for the framework has teachers ask themselves if time on task, student motivation, and social learning has increased due to the integration of technology. Engagement needs to focus on the content and not the features of the technology tool.
![]() |
| Image Source |
At the high school I work at, we have very limited technology available in the classroom. I have a projector in my room and there are 3 computer carts that we share between all teachers. After learning about HyperDocs from the trends in educational technology assignment, I decided to create a math lesson where students explored a geometry topic through various videos and activities. Before this lesson I realized my integration of technology was not fully engaging the students. I reserved our school's computer cart and noticed how much of an affect using technology in a different manner had on my students' learning. I rated myself on this lesson using the Triple E Framework for engagement for learning below. I believe my students were very motivated to start the learning process, but time on task and social learning can to be increased as I continue to integrate technology in this manner.
![]() |
| Image Source |
2) Enhancement of the Learning Goals
The second level of the framework emphasizes the "value-added" aspect of the technology. The tool should be used to aid, assist, and scaffold learning. Through differentiation, learning can become more personalized and relatable to the learner. As discussed on the Triple E Framework website, the traditional drill and practice method to teaching does not produce positive achievements for learning outcomes.
![]() |
| Image Source |
When completing the self-evaluation for this level, I believe I was able to create many scaffolds and opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning that they would not have been able to without the use of the HyperDocs. I was able to incorporate student choice into the document and allow students to learn in a method that was most suitable to their learning style. I believe that I can still work on incorporating high-order thinking skills into my lesson.
![]() |
| Image Source |
![]() |
| Image Source |
During the self-evaluation for extending the learning goals, I realized I was able to incorporate soft skills that related to students' everyday life. I took a geometry topic and had students explore future careers that required the use of specific math skills. Although I was able to include opportunities for students to learn and make connections about geometry outside of their typical school and everyday life experiences, I believe I can explore these concepts more through collaborative opportunities available through technology.
![]() |
| Image Source |
![]() |
| Image Source |









Katie this is an excellent post. Your self reflection was well done and I love the fact that you used your Hyperdocs knowledge to create an assignment and assess it. The "score cards" you displayed for others to see how you rated yourself in each area strengthened the post for me. Well done!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, things are always changing and we need to keep evaluating how we think. Every professional must think this way. I liked that you actually took the time to change the way you taught in class and incorporated the Triple E framework and the Hyperdocs. Technology is always advancing and it is to the benefit of learning!
ReplyDelete